bussetechsoftware studio

Castles / GB / Wales

Castell Pen-yr-Allt

Which definitions does it satisfy?

This dataset does not record whether something “is a castle”. It records a verdict against each named definition, with the reasoning that produced it.

DefinitionVerdictBasis
Fortified residence yes The report describes a motte-and-bailey castle: a 4m-high motte carrying the collapsed remains of a masonry tower (the lord's residential strongpoint) with a bailey defended by a 5–6m rock-cut ditch, a bank standing up to 7m, a counterscarp and geophysically-confirmed complex multivallate defences. That is active defence combined with a lordly residential strongpoint — both halves of the criterion in the classic castle form.
Enclosure fortification unassessed No source consulted so far speaks to this definition. Unassessed is not the same as no.
State fortification unassessed No source consulted so far speaks to this definition. Unassessed is not the same as no.
Palatial seat unassessed No source consulted so far speaks to this definition. Unassessed is not the same as no.
Revival and folly unassessed No source consulted so far speaks to this definition. Unassessed is not the same as no.
Popularly a castle unassessed No source consulted so far speaks to this definition. Unassessed is not the same as no.

Facts

Traditioneuropean medieval
LocationCilgerran, Pembrokeshire, Wales, GB
BuiltMedieval
Confidencemedium
First recorded2026-07-21
Last updated2026-07-22

In the registers

Where this structure appears in official inventories. This is what turns an individual record into evidence about a count.

  • Cof Cymru — National Historic Assets of WalesPE169 · Scheduled Monument — SiteType: Castle · entry

Location

Approximate. © OpenStreetMap contributors.

Notes

Assessed against the Cadw full report (PE169). fortified_residence set to yes: the motte-and-bailey form — a motte with a masonry tower and a bailey defended by rock-cut ditch, 7m bank, counterscarp and multivallate defences — meets both halves of the criterion. The report notes the castle overlies an earlier Iron Age promontory fort (with a possible roundhouse), but describes no fabric of that prehistoric phase in its own terms, so enclosure_fortification is left unassessed rather than guessed. No usage evidence for popular_castle and nothing for the other bands, so they are omitted. Confidence medium: one official report plus the register.

Sources

Signals

Raw per-source observations behind this record (2): sig-20260721-cadw-pe169, sig-20260722-report-pe169

Record file · dataset licensed CC BY 4.0 — see provenance.