bussetechsoftware studio

Castles / GB / Wales

Castell Coety

Which definitions does it satisfy?

This dataset does not record whether something “is a castle”. It records a verdict against each named definition, with the reasoning that produced it.

DefinitionVerdictBasis
Fortified residence yes Coity was the caput of the lordship, held by the de Turberville family from the early 12th century and later the Gamages (identified lords). The inner ward has a faceted curtain wall incorporating a rectangular keep, a west gatehouse and a north-east gatehouse, all set behind a deep ditch and counterscarp bank — active defence held against siege in the 1405 Glyndwr rebellion. Domestic ranges (a first-floor hall over a vaulted undercroft, kitchen with ovens) supply the residence half.
Enclosure fortification unassessed No source consulted so far speaks to this definition. Unassessed is not the same as no.
State fortification unassessed No source consulted so far speaks to this definition. Unassessed is not the same as no.
Palatial seat unassessed No source consulted so far speaks to this definition. Unassessed is not the same as no.
Revival and folly unassessed No source consulted so far speaks to this definition. Unassessed is not the same as no.
Popularly a castle unassessed No source consulted so far speaks to this definition. Unassessed is not the same as no.

Facts

Traditioneuropean medieval
LocationCoity Higher, Bridgend, Wales, GB
BuiltMedieval
Confidencemedium
First recorded2026-07-21
Last updated2026-07-22

In the registers

Where this structure appears in official inventories. This is what turns an individual record into evidence about a count.

  • Cof Cymru — National Historic Assets of WalesGM004 · Scheduled Monument — SiteType: Castle · entry

Location

Approximate. © OpenStreetMap contributors.

Notes

Assessed against the Cadw full report (GM004). fortified_residence yes — identified lords (de Turberville, later Gamage), a full defensive circuit (curtain, keep, two gatehouses, deep ditch and counterscarp) and residential ranges, held under siege in 1405. The 16th-century domestic remodelling (an added storey, new windows, two chimney stacks) improved amenity, but the report records no defensive fabric being removed for it, so palatial_seat is not assessed. No visitor/WHS usage evidence in the report, so popular_castle is omitted; the ringwork origin sits under an identified lordly residence, so enclosure_fortification does not apply. Confidence medium: single official report plus register.

Sources

Signals

Raw per-source observations behind this record (2): sig-20260721-cadw-gm004, sig-20260722-report-gm004

Record file · dataset licensed CC BY 4.0 — see provenance.