bussetechsoftware studio

Castles / GB / Wales

Castell Llansteffan

Which definitions does it satisfy?

This dataset does not record whether something “is a castle”. It records a verdict against each named definition, with the reasoning that produced it.

DefinitionVerdictBasis
Fortified residence yes A square gatehouse defended by portcullis and doors, a later double-towered gatehouse (modelled on Caerphilly's East Gate) with front and rear portcullises, five murder holes and outer machicolations, wall-walks carried on vaults and D-shaped mural towers provide active defence; the North Tower and the gatehouse's well-appointed great rooms with fireplaces served as the lord's private accommodation — both halves met.
Enclosure fortification yes The promontory neck was first defended in the 6th century BC when a double bank and ditch were thrown across it to form a promontory fort — a prehistoric defensive enclosure with no identified lordly residence — satisfying this band for that earliest phase.
State fortification unassessed No source consulted so far speaks to this definition. Unassessed is not the same as no.
Palatial seat unassessed No source consulted so far speaks to this definition. Unassessed is not the same as no.
Revival and folly unassessed No source consulted so far speaks to this definition. Unassessed is not the same as no.
Popularly a castle unassessed No source consulted so far speaks to this definition. Unassessed is not the same as no.

Facts

Traditioneuropean medieval
LocationLlansteffan, Carmarthenshire, Wales, GB
BuiltMedieval
Confidencemedium
First recorded2026-07-21
Last updated2026-07-22

In the registers

Where this structure appears in official inventories. This is what turns an individual record into evidence about a count.

  • Cof Cymru — National Historic Assets of WalesCM004 · Scheduled Monument — SiteType: Castle · entry

Location

Approximate. © OpenStreetMap contributors.

Notes

Upgraded to an assessed record from Cadw's full report (CM004). Two bands carry verdicts for two phases: enclosure_fortification 'yes' for the Iron Age promontory fort, fortified_residence 'yes' for the medieval castle. The Tudor conversion 'from a military structure into a comfortable residence' was weighed for palatial_seat but left unassessed — the castle retained heavy defences and the change was a blocked gatehouse, not a palatial rebuild. popular_castle left unassessed (taken into state care in 1959, but the report gives no visitor-operation or tourism evidence).

Sources

Signals

Raw per-source observations behind this record (2): sig-20260721-cadw-cm004, sig-20260722-report-cm004

Record file · dataset licensed CC BY 4.0 — see provenance.