bussetechsoftware studio

Castles / GH / Central Region

Elmina Castle

Which definitions does it satisfy?

This dataset does not record whether something “is a castle”. It records a verdict against each named definition, with the reasoning that produced it.

DefinitionVerdictBasis
Fortified residence no A garrison and trading establishment rather than the residence of a private lord. The resident governor held office from a state, which is the distinction the criterion turns on.
Enclosure fortification no A designed artillery-era fort, not a prehistoric enclosure.
State fortification yes Built and garrisoned by the Portuguese crown as a fortified trading post and later held by the Dutch and British states. State commission and military purpose, with no private lordly residence organising it.
Palatial seat no Not a palatial residence.
Revival and folly no Genuine defensive fabric.
Popularly a castle yes Universally called Elmina Castle, a World Heritage site and one of the most visited historic sites in Ghana.

Facts

Traditionafrican
LocationElmina, Central Region, GH
Built1482 · Portuguese 1482, Dutch from 1637, British from 1872
Conditionintact
Confidencehigh
First recorded2026-07-21
Last updated2026-07-21

In the registers

Where this structure appears in official inventories. This is what turns an individual record into evidence about a count.

  • WikidataQ1140852 · entry

Location

Approximate. © OpenStreetMap contributors.

Notes

Raised in the originating thread as a case where the strict definition and ordinary usage collide, and where the word does heavy and uncomfortable work: Elmina was a site of the transatlantic slave trade, and its dungeons are what most visitors come to see. UNESCO's own inscription is titled 'Forts and Castles' - using both words rather than choosing. A dataset that quietly resolves this to 'castle' or quietly drops it is making a historical judgement while appearing to make a taxonomic one.

Sources

Record file · dataset licensed CC BY 4.0 — see provenance.